Iptables (and the successor nftables) is a powerful packet filtering system in the Linux kernel, able to create advanced firewall capabilities. One of the features that it cannot provide is per-application filtering. Together with SELinux however, it is possible to implement this on a per domain basis.

SELinux does not know applications, but it knows domains. If we ensure that each application runs in its own domain, then we can leverage the firewall capabilities with SELinux to only allow those domains access that we need.

SELinux network control: packet types

The basic network control we need to enable is SELinux' packet types. Most default policies will grant application domains the right set of packet types:

~# sesearch -s mozilla_t -c packet -A
Found 13 semantic av rules:
   allow mozilla_t ipp_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t soundd_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow nsswitch_domain dns_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t speech_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t ftp_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t http_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t tor_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t squid_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
   allow mozilla_t http_cache_client_packet_t : packet { send recv } ; 
 DT allow mozilla_t server_packet_type : packet recv ; [ mozilla_bind_all_unreserved_ports ]
 DT allow mozilla_t server_packet_type : packet send ; [ mozilla_bind_all_unreserved_ports ]
 DT allow nsswitch_domain ldap_client_packet_t : packet recv ; [ authlogin_nsswitch_use_ldap ]
 DT allow nsswitch_domain ldap_client_packet_t : packet send ; [ authlogin_nsswitch_use_ldap ]

As we can see, the mozilla_t domain is able to send and receive packets of type ipp_client_packet_t, soundd_client_packet_t, dns_client_packet_t, speech_client_packet_t, ftp_client_packet_t, http_client_packet_t, tor_client_packet_t, squid_client_packet_t and http_cache_client_packet_t. If the SELinux booleans mentioned at the end are enabled, additional packet types are alloed to be used as well.

But even with this default policy in place, SELinux is not being consulted for filtering. To accomplish this, iptables will need to be told to label the incoming and outgoing packets. This is the SECMARK functionality that I've blogged about earlier.

Enabling SECMARK filtering through iptables

To enable SECMARK filtering, we use the iptables command and tell it to label SSH incoming and outgoing packets as ssh_server_packet_t:

~# iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNSECMARK --restore
~# iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j SECMARK --selctx system_u:object_r:ssh_server_packet_t:s0
~# iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNSECMARK --restore
~# iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 22 -j SECMARK --selctx system_u:object_r:ssh_server_packet_t:s0

But be warned: the moment iptables starts with its SECMARK support, all packets will be labeled. Those that are not explicitly labeled through one of the above commands will be labeled with the unlabeled_t type, and most domains are not allowed any access to unlabeled_t.

There are two things we can do to improve this situation:

  1. Define the necessary SECMARK rules for all supported ports (which is something that secmarkgen does), and/or
  2. Allow unlabeled_t for all domains.

To allow the latter, we can load a SELinux rule like the following:

(allow domain unlabeled_t (packet (send recv)))

This will allow all domains to send and receive packets of the unlabeled_t type. Although this is something that might be security-sensitive, it might be a good idea to allow at start, together with proper auditing (you can use (auditallow ...) to audit all granted packet communication) so that the right set of packet types can be enabled. This way, administrators can iteratively improve the SECMARK rules and finally remove the unlabeled_t privilege from the domain attribute.

To list the current SECMARK rules, list the firewall rules for the mangle table:

~# iptables -t mangle -nvL

Only granting one application network access

These two together allow for creating a firewall that only allows a single domain access to a particular target.

For instance, suppose that we only want the mozilla_t domain to connect to the company proxy (10.15.10.5). We can't enable the http_client_packet_t for this connection, as all other web browsers and other HTTP-aware applications will have policy rules enabled to send and receive that packet type. Instead, we are going to create a new packet type to use.

;; Definition of myhttp_client_packet_t
(type myhttp_client_packet_t)
(roletype object_r myhttp_client_packet_t)
(typeattributeset client_packet_type (myhttp_client_packet_t))
(typeattributeset packet_type (myhttp_client_packet_t))

;; Grant the use to mozilla_t
(typeattributeset cil_gen_require mozilla_t)
(allow mozilla_t myhttp_client_packet_t (packet (send recv)))

Putting the above in a myhttppacket.cil file and loading it allows the type to be used:

~# semodule -i myhttppacket.cil

Now, the myhttp_client_packet_t type can be used in iptables rules. Also, only the mozilla_t domain is allowed to send and receive these packets, effectively creating an application-based firewall, as all we now need to do is to mark the outgoing packets towards the proxy as myhttp_client_packet_t:

~# iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -d 10.15.10.5 -j SECMARK --selctx system_u:object_r:myhttp_client_packet_t:s0

This shows that it is possible to create such firewall rules with SELinux. It is however not an out-of-the-box solution, requiring thought and development of both firewall rules and SELinux code constructions. Still, with some advanced scripting experience this will lead to a powerful addition to a hardened system.


Comments

To comment as a guest, use "Or sign up with disqus" and then select the "I'd rather post as guest" option.

comments powered by Disqus