When using SECMARK, the administrator configures the iptables or netfilter rules to add a label to the packet data structure (on the host itself) that can be governed through SELinux policies. Unlike peer labeling, here the labels assigned to the network traffic is completely locally defined. Consider the following command:

# iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --src --dport 443
  -j SECMARK --selctx system_u:object_r:myauth_packet_t

With this command, packets that originate from the host and arrive on port 443 (typically used for HTTPS traffic) are marked as myauth_packet_t. SELinux policy writers can then allow domains to receive this type of packets (or send) through the packet class:

# Allow sockets with mydomain_t context to receive packets labeled myauth_packet_t
allow mydomain_t myauth_packet_t:packet recv;

The SELinux policy modules enable this through the corenet_sendrecv_<type>_{client,server}_packets interfaces:

# allow mybrowser_t http_client_packet_t:packet { send recv };

As a common rule, packets are marked as client packets or server packets, depending on the role of the domain. In the above example, the domain is a browser, so acts as a web client. So, it needs to send and receive http_client_packet_t. A web server on the other hand would need to send and receive http_server_packet_t. Note that the packets that are sent over the wire do not have any labels assigned to them - this is all local to the system. So even when the source and destination use SELinux with SECMARK, on the source server the packets might be labeled as http_client_packet_t whereas on the target they are seen as http_server_packet_t.

As far as I know, when you want to use SECMARK, you will need to set the contexts with iptables yourself (there is no default labeling), so knowing about the above convention is important.

Again, Paul Moore has more information about this.


To comment as a guest, use "Or sign up with disqus" and then select the "I'd rather post as guest" option.

comments powered by Disqus