Probably not a first for many seasoned Linux administrators, and probably not correct accordingly to more advanced users than myself, but I just found out that Unix domain sockets are files. Even when they're not.

I have been looking at a weird SELinux denial I had occuring on my system:

avc:  denied  { read write } for  pid=10012 comm="hostname"

path="socket:[318867]" dev=sockfs ino=318867

I had a tough time trying to figure out why in earth the hostname application was trying to read/write to a socket that was owned by dhcpcd. Even more, I didn't see a connectto attempt, and there is nothing in my policy that would allow the hostname_t domain to connect to a unix_stream_socket of dhcpc_t. But moreover I was intrigued why the given path was no real path, even though it has an inode.

So I dug up lsof, which returned the following on this socket:

# lsof -p 10017
dhcpcd  10017 root    3u     unix 0x0000000000000000      0t0 318867 socket
dhcpcd  10017 root    4w      REG              252,3        6 268749 /var/run/
dhcpcd  10017 root    5u     unix 0x0000000000000000      0t0 318869 socket

Still no luck in figuring out what that is. And even /proc/net/unix didn't give anything back:

# grep 318867 /proc/net/unix
Num               RefCount Protocol Flags    Type St Inode Path
0000000000000000: 00000002 00000000 00000000 0001 01 318867

So I started looking at Unix domain sockets, what they are, how they are used, etc. And I learned that

  • Unix domain sockets are just files. Well, most of the time. To use a socket (from server-perspective), a programmer first calls socket() to create a socket descriptor, which is a special type of file descriptor. It then bind()'s the socket to a (socket)file on the file system, listen()'s for incoming connections and eventually accept()'s them. Clients also use socket() but then call connectto() to have its socket connected to a (socket)file and eventually read() and write() (or send() and recv()).
  • Linux supports an abstract namespace for sockets, so not all of these are actually bound/connected to a file. Instead, they connect to a "name" instead, which cannot be traced back to a file. For those interested, looking at /proc/net/unix or netstat -xa shows the abstract ones starting with an @ sign.
  • Not all Unix sockets (actually almost the majority of sockets on my system) can be traced back to either a file or abstract name.

And this latter is eating me up. I assume that these sockets were originally created on a file system, but immediately after they were bind()'ed, the file is unlinked, making it harder (impossible?) to find what the socket file was called to begin with. I first thought it were sockets that were not bind()'ed to, but many of them have the state CONNECTED displayed (in the netstat -xa output) so that's not a likely scenario. In any case, if you know how these sockets can have an inode without a known path, please let me know.

But what has this to do with my previous investigation? Well, because the sockets are descriptors, they are passed when a process uses fork() and execve(). And looking at the source code of dhcpcd, I noticed that it does not close its file descriptors when it calls its hook scripts (through the exec_script() function of its sources). As a result, the open file descriptors (including the sockets) are passed on to the hook scripts - one of them calling hostname.

So what I saw in the AVC denials was a leaked socket (so there was no connectto originating from the hostname_t domain since the connection was made by dhcpc in the dhcpc_t domain) that is for some reason being read/written to. A leaked unix stream socket.


To comment as a guest, use "Or sign up with disqus" and then select the "I'd rather post as guest" option.

comments powered by Disqus