Recently I've seen quite a few messages on IRC pop up about policy.25 or even policy.26 so I harassed the guys in the chat channel to talk about it. Apparently, these new binary policy formats add support for filename transitions and non-process role transitions.

Currently, when you initiate a type transition, you would use something like so:

type_transition mysqld_t mysql_db_t:sock_file mysqld_var_run_t;

This statement sais that, if a process running in the mysqld_t domain creates a socket in a directory labelled with mysql_db_t, then this socket gets the mysqld_var_run_t label. In other words, the type transitions from mysql_db_t (parent label) to mysqld_var_run_t.

What will be supported from version 25 onwards is that you can add another argument, the file name (well, actually it is called "last name component" and should be seen as what basename /path/to/something returns). That allows processes running in the same domain and writing files in directories labelled with the same type to still have these files labelled specifically. A non-existing example:

type_transition puppet_t etc_t:file locale_t timezone;
type_transition puppet_t etc_t:file net_conf_t resolv.conf;

In the above example, if the puppet_t domain creates files in /etc (which is labelled etc_t) then based on the file it is creating, this file gets a different label (/etc/timezone gets labelled locale_t whereas /etc/resolv.conf gets labelled net_conf_).

The second change (valid since policy version 26) is that role transitions now also support non-process class transitions. A lengthy post that Harry Ciao made helps to describe it. The role_transition support in SELinux was previously used in the following way:

role_transition roleA_r some_exec_t roleB_r;

What this statement indicates is that a domain running within roleA_r and that is executing some_exec_t will change its runtime role to roleB_r. If by calling some_exec_t a domain transition occurs as well (which is most common when a role transition is supported as well) then this domain will run with the roleB_r runtime role.

The added functionality is now that this isn't limited to processes anymore. You can now define non-process classes as well. If the source domain creates something new of a particular class and a role transition is declared for that, then the resulting new object will have the specified role assigned to it (rather than the default object_r). So for instance:

role_transition sysadm_r cron_spool_t:file sysadm_r;

If a domain running within the sysadm_r role creates a file in a directory labelled cron_spool_t, then the resulting file will have the role sysadm_r rather than object_r. This opens up more support for role-based access controls (similar to the UBAC functionality that I described earlier, but in some cases more flexible). I'm pretty sure that the crontab management for vixie-cron will be one of the first ones that can benefit greatly from this ;-)


Comments

To comment as a guest, use "Or sign up with disqus" and then select the "I'd rather post as guest" option.

comments powered by Disqus