cvechecker version 0.1 is out. This is the first publicly available development release, so it's still far from production-ready yet. However, it is usable so it can now be publicly analyzed to remove all icky bugs and such. I'm not planning (m)any new features (apart from the reporting script as mentioned on the tools' homepage) before the first general available release, but any request will be gladly documented and taken in scope in future versions.

What is cvechecker? Well, it is a tool that strives to scan your system for installed software. For each software it detects, it attempts to discover which version you have. This information is stored in a local database. The tool then matches this information with the (publicly available) CVE data (security vulnerability information). If a CVE entry mentions the software/version you have, the tool will report this to you.

Who needs cvechecker? Noone needs it, but it can be interesting nevertheless. Users that install lots of software themselves and don't use the Linux distribution's package manager might benefit from this as the tool will then help them verify if a security update is needed or not. Users of LinuxFromScratch can do some security validation tests on their installations. Developers of particular packages (or even tools) can use the tool to be notified when one of their software's has a CVE (which most likely results in a new version of the software to be made available).

Who needs cvechecker? No, this is not a duplicate paragraph - cvechecker needs input. Most of the work goes in detecting the available software and version. The method cvechecker uses is very rudimentary: run a (predefined) regular expression against the file (which is parsed with the strings command as this command understands ELF structures) and if the expression matches, it will extract the version (which is found using the expressions' groups) and store this in the database. The rules are defined in the versions.dat file (also available from sourceforge), but this file is currently microscopicly filled - so lots and lots of additional rules need to be added. I'll be adding more and more rules as I encounter them (or have immediate need for), but I can definitely use additional help here.

If you are interested in enhancing the versions.dat file, check out the cvechecker manual page - it describes the format and how it is used as well as some examples.

And yes, an ebuild is available in my overlay, but I'm no ebuild developer (it's just easy to have them so Portage can track it) and the ebuild is butt-ugly (and probably also violates all QA policies).


Comments

To comment as a guest, use "Or sign up with disqus" and then select the "I'd rather post as guest" option.

comments powered by Disqus